I love science fiction. I’ve been waiting for years for Michio Kaku to reveal the fact that we will finally get our flying cars and personal robot assistants.

But you don’t hear too many people talking about the distant future of the Church, except for maybe John’s Revelation. The General Board of Discipleship has gathered some of the leading minds in the United Methodist Church and asked them to pull back the veil on the future. Their answers are both shocking and not at all surprising.

The most important things that I heard:

“The Church is primarily a network at the structural level. [The local] community focuses much more intently on discipling people, on sending them in mission in Christ’s name, and holding them accountable, not only for what they did, but how they were growing in holiness of heart and life.”

–Taylor Burton-Edwards

“There will be a Church. The question in my mind is “Will there be a United Methodist Church. We have to make the case for “Why Jesus? Why Wesleyan theology? Why the Methodist movement?”

–Karen Greenwaldt 

“We may go back to the Wesleyan model of the small group. We may have fewer brick and mortar churches and more house churches.”

–Sarah Wilke 

“What makes transforming the existing congregation difficult? In a word: Inertia.”

–Taylor Burton-Edwards

“[With] our current trajectory toward individualization and customization … it’s hard to imagine how a community is going to live and work together and worship together and pray together. But I’m confident that the Spirit can work it out.”

–Tom Albin

“There is a more transforming way that church needs to think: The pastors and leadership teams and the whole congregation — how we can change ourselves first to change the whole culture of the church and the whole culture of the community.”

–David Kim

These questions focus in on an often neglected component of theological thinking and discourse. That orphaned field is the study of praxis. How are we to be in the world? An excellent question, but one that must be answered within the context of our culture. And our culture is unique among other cultures. We are United Methodist.

This means that we must examine ourselves within the context of United Methodist culture. That is not to say that only a United Methodist can make this examination — far from it. What it means is that we cannot ignore the tenets of our past and current culture when casting about for a new direction for ourselves. But how to examine this? Theologically? Historically? Sociologically? The answer is, of course, “YES.”

N. T. Wright has stunned colleagues with the simple brilliance of his works. Wright has opened up new fields of orthodoxy by simply applying his exegetical methods in a very consistent pattern of analysis. I think that his methods would apply very well here as well.

Wright asks that the thinking person simply consider the historical elements of story, symbol, praxis, and questions when determining the history (and I would add future) of a culture, nation, or organization. The questions are fourfold as well: Who are we? Where are we? What is the problem? and What is the solution?

I’ll be writing on the concepts of story, symbol, praxis, and the four questions in coming weeks. For now, suffice it to say that we have much to consider when it comes to who we are and how we are to be in the world where we live. These answers, like the suggestions offered by the video above, will not surprise you. But they won’t be easy answers either.

 

Isaiah 53:4-6 by Melissa Nees Hauger

One of the most profound, yet confusing passages in the writings of the prophets is from the book of  Isaiah, chapter 53, verses 4-6.

Isaiah 53:4-6

4 Surely he took up our pain
and bore our suffering,
yet we considered him punished by God,
stricken by him, and afflicted.
5 But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was on him,
and by his wounds we are healed.
6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to our own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.
     - New International Version (NIV)

I understand that Christ took our punishment on the Cross for our sins. I also understand that there is a wisdom that comes with woundedness and scarring. Henri Nouwen imparts that each of us is a wounded healer in some way, on one level or another. He goes on to speak of our woundedness and our recovery as what makes us authentic in ministry to our friends, our neighbors, the stranger and the enemy.

Our own experience with loneliness, depression, and fear can become a gift for others, especially when we have received good care. As long as our wounds are open and bleeding, we scare others away. But after someone has carefully tended to our wounds, they no longer frighten us or others.
When we experience the healing presence of another person, we can discover our own gifts of healing. Then our wounds allow us to enter into a deep solidarity with our wounded brothers and sisters.

To enter into solidarity with a suffering person does not mean that we have to talk with that person about our own suffering. Speaking about our own pain is seldom helpful for someone who is in pain. A wounded healer is someone who can listen to a person in pain without having to speak about his or her own wounds. When we have lived through a painful depression, we can listen with great attentiveness and love to a depressed friend without mentioning our experience. Mostly it is better not to direct a suffering person’s attention to ourselves. We have to trust that our own bandaged wounds will allow us to listen to others with our whole beings. That is healing.”
     -Henri Nouwen, The Wounded Healer, 1979

Who better to love and support the alcoholic than the recovering alcoholic? Who better to enter into the pain of another’s heartbrokenness than one who has been there and done that?

I found that my father’s death has been more than I could bear at times. But in each of those dark moments, I reached out to someone who had lost their father as well. My biological sister and my brother have been healers to me — sometimes, without even knowing it. But that is not to shortchange those who had more experience with that particular type of loss than I or my siblings. I remember one colleague who shared the difficulty of the seventh year after the loss of his mother while I was yet in the second year of my loss. When year seven came to me, I was somewhat prepared by his sharing. And I’ve kept that in mind as I shared with others.

In days past, I have called you to consider your addictions, your hurts. I’ve asked you to reflect upon your bad habits and your harbored hatred. One of the reasons I’ve asked this of you is to call you into deeper relationship with Christ. By reflecting on those negative places in our lives, we have the opportunity to bring them before Christ. Too often, we suffer without thinking. We ached without reflecting. But when the pain of our moments is considered, there is a chance, at long last, to bring those pains before the throne of Christ. And in that moment, we are forced to realize the defilement that those awkward sins and long-held-hurts are bringing to our existence.

In the presence of Christ, our sins stand out for what they are. No longer can we fool ourselves into believing that we are right to hold the grudge. Gone is the justification for hatred. And how quickly departs the rationalization for the addictions and selfishness we embrace.

But then comes the moment that offers us renewed purpose. Most of us have been conducted into the presence of Christ by one who was, in turn, shown the way home.

Now it is our turn. Because of the authenticity of your experiences, you can be trusted. Your experience provides wisdom. Your experiences offer a knowledge that cannot be had on the other side of the pain. But, more importantly, our healed wounds give us a sense of authenticity. This is the greatest gift of all the products of healing. You can become living proof that the suffering is finite, the pain is temporary, and the hope that we offer is real.

Make no mistake: Jesus is the healer. But you can provide the conduit.

T. S. Eliot says it better with verse (T. S. Eliot, The Complete Poems and Plays, London 1985, p. 181):

The wounded surgeon plies the steel
That questions the distempered part;
beneath the bleeding hands we feel
The sharp compassion of the healer’s art.

Who are the people in your life that are walking the path of brokenness where once you yourself walked?

Image by Melissa Nees Hauger. Used with permission.
 

You’ve probably seen this already, the viral video about one young man’s effort to dissect his faith and remove the evil that has grown up inside it. Jefferson Bethke titles his spoken word missive, “I Hate Religion.” See it here.

His goal is to remove “religion” from his relationship with Jesus.

I don’t think he can do it.

The problem here is the notion that “having no religion at all” is better than the religious behavior we so often see. How do you completely eliminate religion in your life? Apathy and atheism make a go of it, the former more successful than the latter. But I don’t see how you could.

I do see why he might think you should though. In fact, I think he makes a good point.

“Why has religion started so many wars?” Because of people.

“Why does it build huge churches, but fails to feed the poor?” Because of people.

Religion is a simple proposition. It’s not a list of rules, though it can be. It’s not a strict way of life, though it can be. It isn’t a bunch of old white guys telling everyone what to do. But it can be. In a stroke of irony, Jeff is declaring his religion, even as he hopes to kill off the idea in his life.

But what he is doing is dangerous for those who aren’t mature in Christ. Here’s what I mean.

A Practical Definition for Religion

Religion, simply put, is those beliefs to which I bind myself. That’s it.

So before we’re even below the fold, Jeff’s idea is on the ropes. Now, I’m not here to refute what he’s done. He’s a well meaning kid with good ideas, but he’s suggesting an alternative that is worse than the one he’s railing against. More on that in a minute.

That means that the question is this, “How do I decide what is worthy of binding or loosing?” Great question. Let’s ask someone smarter than me. No, wait, that would be ‘religious.’ Well, yes. And that’s okay.

Without someone wiser than I am, I’m forced to follow my own authority. I’m the only one holding myself accountable. But you might say, “No one is Lord over me except Jesus. I don’t need worldly wisdom.”

Okay. So who decides what Jesus meant when he said, “Blessed are the poor?” Do we all get to make up our own interpretation?

My faith is based on so much more than just my ability to reason. It has more to it than just the sum of my own experiences. I’m bound up in traditions that I have chosen, examined, embraced, re-examined and chosen again. But all this took place within community. All of this took place within the Church.

Let me put it another way.

Every Man for Himself

There’s been a lot of talk about the Automotive Industry. It has gotten away from its roots. Once, it was all about building the best car they could. In a massive oversimplification, I’m going to put forth the idea, “And then they got wrapped up in the bottom line.”

So what shall we do? Make our own cars? Theoretically, we are all capable in some sense. And some people do. But even those folks got their skill and expertise from somewhere, most likely Detroit or one of her ilk. Personally, I need the community to make me whole, to help me hear God, and to hold me in loving accountability.

“But Faith is different,” you say. “God can speak directly to me.” Yes, God can. But does God do that? Don’t we have enough folks claiming God’s voice every Sunday in Church, every Friday at synagogue, and every few hours at the Mosque?

So What Is the Answer?

The guy in the video makes a great case — if you are a perfect Christian. In short, there is a baby in all that bath water. All I’m suggesting is that he pare down the stuff that he wants to get rid of.

Unnecessary wars over differing beliefs? I’m with him. Down with war.

Huge churches in debt while the poor starve? I’m in. Let’s knock all that stuff off.

Blasting single moms for being divorced? Please. Most of my denomination quit that years ago.

Don’t let the religious establishment tell you how to vote. Vote for the candidate who will do the job of running the country. Let religion preach morality (or would they rather preach to themselves exactly what they want to hear…) and let laws prevent injustice.

What Religion/The Church Means to Me

Personally, I need the church for way more than my job.

I personally need the church for its gathered resources. I need the traditions, the doctrines, and the scriptures that came out of them. Yes, the bible was written by men who were codifying their faith, and thank God they did.

Wesley taught his followers that the way to the Mind of Christ was through Scripture, but it has to be interpreted through the aggregate lens of tradition, experience and reason.

And now we are down to the crux of the problem. Jefferson Bethke is saying that he doesn’t need all four. The folks in the right wing are saying you only need the traditions (and their ubiquitous opinions) to live right.

Both assertions are wrong.

Balance Relationship and Tradition

I say you need all four: Scripture, tradition, experience, and reason. You cannot interpret Scripture without the lens of Tradition which has carried forth the meaning of the words. And you cannot abandon those two facets for your own experience and ability to reason.

Quite frankly, most of us are not up to that particular challenge.

Scripture is the foundation of our understanding. Tradition is the walls holding up the roof of Reason. And our Experiences come from time spent in this house of existence. This is important, because some folks like to let the Quadrilateral take a vote. But one should never let experience and reason trump Scripture. Priorities do matter, after all.

Let’s take them one at a time.

Scripture is the revealed Word of God. (If we disagree on that point, I’m actually quite honored that you showed up to read this to begin with. And quite frankly, I’m amazed you read this far.) But it is a facet of our religion. You can’t throw it out and hope to learn about Jesus without someone telling you the story.

Tradition is the faithfully transmitted history of the response of the Church to God’s revealed self. Otherwise known as, “The Way We’ve Always Done That.” But that’s a misnomer, because the Church has changed and grown over the years. I can resonate with Jeff’s impatient stance. “If you can’t follow God into the Changes, then you aren’t following God.” But it does take time…and patience. The best thing about serving the Church is the people. The most frustrating thing about serving the Church is … also the people.

Our experiences color our thinking. Even Moses’ first encounter with God was obvious because it ran counter to his experiences with bushes and the way they are supposed to burn.

And finally, we have to admit that there’s a point to what Jefferson Bethke is saying.  We have an obligation to thoughtfully consider our faith. We have an opportunity to prayerfully approach the questions of the day. Too many Christians are letting the Jerry Falwells and Rush Limbaughs of the world tell us what we should believe and how we should vote, er, act.

That’s just what they want.

One last thing. Remember our definition of religion? Religion is the combined beliefs to which I bind myself. If you believe in free will, and I’ll bet you do, then you know that the best part of religion is deciding when to tell the war-starters, divorcee-bashers, money-grubbers, and hate-mongerers that their beliefs are not your beliefs.

There’s a catch, and it sends me running back to my Bible, my traditions, and my experiences every time: My reason must be informed. I can’t just leave because I want to. I have to know that I’m as close to right as I can be.

And then comes the leap of faith.

Someone tell Jefferson how much I think of his work. It was truly inspired. But I do so wish he would hold on to the baby the next time he’s tossing out the bathwater.

 

SOPA is the “STOP ONLINE PIRACY ACT” written by Representative Lamar Smith.

We already have legislation that makes digital piracy a crime. The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act lays out enforcement measures. The problem is enforcement. Representative Smith doesn’t like the current effectiveness of the law, or at least the folks who are backing him don’t.

So SOPA takes it to the next level.  The real trouble seems to be overseas. And they are hard to move on. So if you can’t force sites in other countries to take down copyrighted work, the idea behind SOPA is that you can at least stop U.S. companies from providing their services to those sites. You can also make it harder for U.S. Internet users to find and access the sites by removing their information from the DNS (it’s like a giant phonebook for the internet, and is the primary resource for most search engines).

SOPA is far more “toothsome” than DMCA and potentially puts site operators — even those based in the U.S. — on the hook for content that their users upload. The proposed bill’s text says that a site could be deemed a SOPA violator, and is thus culpable if it “facilitates” copyright infringement.

Too many sites are open source for this to work. The internet isn’t “managed” by the owners of the various websites. Individual users are the violators, even though the websites are the “crime scene.” It’s like arresting the hotel manager for the murder that was committed by one of her guests in one of the hotel’s rooms.

Confused? Watch this video from Fight for the Future:

Read more here today:

http://www.reddit.com/ (January 18)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more (January 18)

http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/17/technology/sopa_explained/index.htm

Watch this excellent video over at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/31100268 

What You Can Do

Freedom isn’t free. It’s going to take some action. Granted, you aren’t being asked “Take your powder, and take your gun. Report to General Washington.” But you are being asked to pick you your phone. Write an email.

Get to the bottom of this
before the internet becomes
regulated by those with money
instead of those with a free voice.

 

© 2012 One Pastor's Thoughts Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • NetworkedBlogs
  • Twitter
  • Picasa
  • YouTube
  • Delicious