Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) declared unconstitutional sections of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
You likely have an opinion.
I do, too. I’d like our opinions to meet, have coffee, and learn from each other.
Here’s mine. The ruling of the Supreme Court makes perfect sense if you understand that the Constitution is the operative document.
The ruling of the Supreme Court makes no sense if you think that the Constitution is based on Scripture as the operative document.
The ruling of the Supreme Court makes some sense, but adds a great deal of tension to our legal, ethical, and moral understanding of the Constitution, a document influenced by Scripture and written by men who were at least familiar with the principles contained therein.
That said, I think it is time for a clear distinction between legislating our beliefs and legislating ethical behavior. We’ve spent far too long on the former and ignored the latter.
A Developing Philosophy of Government
The business of legislating is designed for the common good. I know enough about the Constitution to understand that. Laws are not about making people agree with a cultural or religious position. Our society no longer has the ability nor the desire to enforce the broad cultural norms that once predominated.
For many, that’s a good thing. But for others, it is a moment of panic. It is a time of desperation. And legislation seems to be the last-ditch-effort weapon of choice.
As much as I would like people to agree with me on every subjective matter, I can’t see that happening. The reason is plain: I don’t agree with the growing majorities in society on a broad raft of issues. Should I mount some sort of morality crusade and get people back to behaving like “God-fearing Americans?” No, not really. Because God-fearing Americans disagree on some of these issues. And, as a matter of faith, it can be very difficult to bring an argument that doesn’t collapse under the weight of empirical evidence.
Most of these issues are subjective, which means that interpretation and choice is very much involved. In my way of thinking, this means that free-will Christians (if they are willing to put their money where their mouth is) should get busy wishing people well on their chosen path in life, even if it is a moment of disagreement.
One of the truest measures of our character is the manner in which we disagree with someone. Jesus forgave the very men who killed him. Jesus was civil to the men who were turning the political wheels that meant his death. He saved his anger for the moment when the system was forcing itself upon those who could not resist it and could not comply with it without detriment.
In this country, there are plenty of objective issues that have been ignored for a very long time. We have passed multiple laws to force compliance with our beliefs. Yet we’ve failed to control behaviors that are self-serving to a pitifully small number of people and harmful to the nation.
Deregulation of industry has created an environment of laissez faire. And plenty of corporations are busy “laissezing it up.” This isn’t a subjective issue, though we like to say that we prefer a free society where businesses allow the market to determine behaviors. That means, “whatever makes me the most money must be okay.”
And if you don’t think money talks, you are missing the show.
In the current polarized culture, money keeps us from acting as a united people. We are manipulated by one side and then the other. And the ones with the most money usually take the day rather than the ones who are best able to support their ideas.
We loan billions to insolvent financial corporations. We charge nightmarish rates of interest to the future leaders of this country when they obtain student loans.
Is that a religious issue? No. Is is a justice issue? Yes.
So where does this leave the Church? Not where some people seem to think.
Religion Is Not For Everyone
While I would love to think that we are all gonna climb under one big tent someday soon, I know better. And I think you do, too.
Scripture says that one day, “every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is Lord.” And when that happens, it will be because Christ has returned and God has made it happen.
It will not be because the Church has usurped that authority and made it the law of the land.
In fact, the passage, in context, says this:
10 Why do you pass judgment on your brother or sister? Or you, why do you despise your brother or sister? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written,
“As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me,
and every tongue shall give praise to God.”
12 So then, each of us will be accountable to God.
The Role of the Church
I’m not an enforcer. I’m a proclaimer. No, not the Scottish duo from the 80’s.
I’m a prophet. The job is to share the news, to bring the truth, and to help folks to understand it.
Every time the Church has gotten into the enforcement business, it has resulted in horrific mistreatment of the innocent and the not-so-innocent. I see no reason to bring back the Inquisition. I want nothing to do with Pharisaic codes that require people to check up on each other and report back to the leaders of the Church.
Jesus did not die for this kind of behavior.
He died to offer salvation, not to force it upon you. He died to make you free, not to free you “whether you like it or not.” He died for your sins, not so you could sin against your neighbor just because he sins differently than you do.
Think about it: Jesus freed us from the law, and here we are two thousand years later trying to create a new set laws to force our beliefs on those around us.
The more we push, the more folks will push back. Clamp down and people will resist and revolt.
Why is this lesson so hard for us?
Share the good news. Offer them Christ. Be prepared to do so at a moment’s notice.
And be prepared for folks to say, “No.”
I am a bit out of the BOX…..but to me….Church and State are two different things…..we are not discussing a biblical marriage…we are talking about a civil union. I don’t care who you love….the law ….LAW not BIBLE…..we are talking about insurance and mortgages and children…..not about the bible. Forget your religion for a moment and tell my why these children and loved ones do not deserve to have the same medical benefits that my spouse and kids do. Show me where, in the Bible, it tells me that they are not privy to those rights?
I think I do better by “not forgetting my religion for a minute.” That makes it a lot easier to knock away the pharisaic laws that try to control behavior and only end up hurting people who are only involved by tangent.
Short answer: It doesn’t. That’s kinda my point. 😉
The reason so many of my colleagues get so uptight about this is that they are afraid that it will undermine the sanctity of marriage. I keep telling them that Kim Kardashian, Johnny Carson, Britney Spears, Mickey Rooney, Larry King, and Elizabeth Taylor have already undermined it plenty.
You have made me cry tears of happiness as well as tears of frustration! You have helped me to understand some of my frustrations.
It is my wish that we will become “fishers of men” and will follow Him.
So be it–To God in his glory!!!
Excellent blog Joey! I agree with you 100%!
I want my Friends & Family & all Americans to be allowed to insure Loved ones, Have Hospital visits & to be treated like Humans. I think I am not seperating my Faith from my Society. I am trying to Do Good, do no harm and Love GOD as well as my Neighbor. To me that means more than “Tolerate Others” or “love the sinner, not the sin”… to me it means being Just & Fair, showing Love, Doing Love and LOVING while I live as I believe GOD would have me Love. Joey Your Artical is Heart felt & Well written, Thank You for touching me with it.
Joey, well done. The debates in the United Methodist Church over human sexuality and related issues has done nothing to prepare us for the arrival of the Kingdom of God on earth, which is something we all pray for in the Lord’s Prayer. The Great Commandment is so often ignored. Since it is “all the law and the prophets,” according to Jesus, why do we need to quote snippets of it against each other? I sometimes want to scream, “If the Bible offend thee, cast it out!” My image of the UMC is one of a moralistic institution that is busy rolling Pearls of Great Price out the door into the pig sty of Nones (no religious preference.) I am grateful to you for your sanity and compassion. I thank you for providing an antidote to my distress.
It breaks my heart that I have a hard time plainly saying what I think. (It seems many of us have the same problem.) The fact of the matter is that I want to “fit in” — and I am afraid to say anything that puts me at risk of being “ostracized”. (A lot like those who have found it difficult to “come out of the closet”?) “The church” can be a cruel place… Maybe that fact is more of a problem than “what we believe”…